Note: body below is original English text extracted from arXiv Atom / HTML. Do not treat this file as a translation.
arXiv:2609.05274 · published 2026-09-04
Abstract
LLM agents deployed for software engineering fail expensively: they act confidently wrong, and bad actions are recognized only after costly execution and retry. We present Speculative Uncertainty (SU), a method that recovers a predictive failure signal for a black-box agent from its output tokens alone, with no access to logits, weights, activations, or repeated sampling. Inverting speculative decoding, a small open-weight draft model scores the agent's already-generated trajectory in a single forward pass. From these speculative cross-likelihoods we extract phase-aware features by separating the reasoning and action spans, and calibrate them against a verifiable objective. SU produces a failure-likelihood score that any downstream policy, such as routing, human intervention, or extra test-time compute, can consume directly. To show the signal is actionable, we instantiate one such policy, a pre-execution veto gate, on software engineering agents Qwen3-Coder-480B and closed-source Claude 3.5 Sonnet, cutting execution error rate by 6-8 percentage points and token cost by 14-19% in deployment, transferring to out-of-distribution benchmarks without retraining, and generalizing across agent models.
Key findings (condensed from paper, still English quotes/paraphrase of claims)
Invert speculative decoding: small open-weight draft model scores already-generated trajectory in one forward pass; phase-aware features (reason vs action spans); calibrate to verifiable objective for routing / intervention / extra tests before costly execution.
Remainder
Full original English text: see html_url / source_url / pdf_url in frontmatter. Do not invent missing sections from this partial extract.