Note: body below is original English text extracted from arXiv abs / PDF. Do not treat this file as a translation.
arXiv:2609.07255 · published 2026-09-07 (date-honest for dig window) · EMNLP2026 main
Abstract
Language-model agents increasingly rely on skills: reusable procedural knowledge for reasoning, tool use, and interaction. Existing work studies how skills are acquired, retrieved, compressed, or composed, but often assumes that once a skill is selected, its interface to the agent is fixed. We argue that this overlooks a key source of skill utility: the same skill can help, distract, or mislead depending on how it is exposed. We propose SkillAlign, a provider-agnostic framework that represents candidate skills as multi-view procedural cards and renders them through alternative exposure interfaces, including full instructions, hints, compressed summaries, workflows, or no exposure. This enables counterfactual evaluation where the task, agent, and candidate skills are fixed while only the exposure interface varies. Across ALFWorld and SkillsBench, we show that exposure form substantially affects task success and rendered context cost, and that compact top-k exposure can outperform full-library injection. We further conduct a replay-based policy-learning analysis on ALFWorld, showing that adaptive exposure contains learnable signal but remains far from oracle selection. Our results suggest that skill-augmented agents should optimize not only which skills to use, but also how those skills are presented.
Key claims (verbatim-leaning English extract)
- SkillAlign separates skill selection from skill exposure: upstream providers determine which skills are available; SkillAlign determines how those skills condition the agent.
- Candidate skills become multi-view procedural cards rendered through exposure interfaces: full instructions, hints, compressed summaries, workflows, or no exposure.
- Counterfactual evaluation holds task, agent, and candidate skills fixed while varying only the exposure interface.
- Across ALFWorld and SkillsBench, exposure form substantially affects task success and rendered skill-context cost; compact top-k exposure can outperform full-library injection.
- Replay-based policy-learning analysis on ALFWorld shows adaptive exposure contains learnable signal but remains far from oracle selection.
- Practical implication: optimize not only which skills to use, but also how those skills are presented.
Remainder
Full original English text: see html_url / source_url / pdf_url in frontmatter. Do not invent missing sections from this partial extract.