Note: body below is original English text extracted from arXiv abs / HTML. Do not treat this file as a translation.
arXiv:2609.11060 · published 2026-09-10
Abstract
Persistent memory is entering production-oriented agent platforms to help long-horizon agents accumulate experience across sessions. Yet a post-task curator agent restricted to completed trajectories can preserve errors, overgeneralize partial evidence, or retain stale knowledge. We introduce environment-probing curation, a deployment-compatible extension that gives an existing asynchronous curator agent least-privilege, read-only world tools to check, scope, and refresh candidate memories. It requires no model retraining and leaves the task agent, retriever, memory representation, and production write authority unchanged. In a production-like GitHub Copilot (GHCP) harness built on its SDK, we compare stateless execution, full in-context learning, GHCP + Mem, and GHCP + Mem (w/ Env Probing) on CLBench database exploration and 90 adapted APEX management-consulting tasks. On CLBench, probing raises pass rate from 39% to 73% and pass-discounted reward from 8.60 to 22.60 while reducing queries from 8.8 to 4.7 per question and task-agent cost from $3.38 to $1.68. Across six APEX worlds, all 18 memory-versus-baseline mean reward comparisons are positive and task-agent tool calls fall by 16–75%; probing gives the best task-agent reward gain per dollar among memory conditions.
Key claims (verbatim-leaning English extract)
- Failure modes of trajectory-only curation: preserve errors, overgeneralize partial evidence, retain stale knowledge.
- Environment-probing: curator gets least-privilege read-only world tools to check/scope/refresh candidates; no retraining; task agent / retriever / memory schema / write authority unchanged.
- Harness: production-like GitHub Copilot (GHCP) SDK setup; conditions: stateless, full ICL, GHCP+Mem, GHCP+Mem(w/ Env Probing).
- CLBench (drift): probing pass 39%→73%; reward 8.60→22.60; queries/question 8.8→4.7; task-agent cost $3.38→$1.68.
- APEX (6 worlds, 90 tasks): all 18 memory-vs-baseline mean reward comparisons positive; tool calls −16–75%; probing best reward/$ among memory conditions.
- Memory amortizes environmental discovery; probing further improves correctness, not only latency.
Remainder
Full original English text: see html_url / source_url / pdf_url in frontmatter.